you're reading...
IP, Patent

Cross-Post: General Patent Corporation Owner Poltorak Suggests Improvements To Patent System

Originally posted at Patent Connections:

Should America adopt German-style utility model patents?

Speaking about patent reform as the founder and spokesman for American Innovators for Patent Reform (AMINN), Alexander Poltorak (also the owner of General Patent Corporation)offered some interesting insight into his suggestions for reform:

Q: What changes would you like to see to the patent system?

A: This patent reform debate is a huge missed opportunity to reform the system. The system is antiquated in the sense that the same patents are awarded to inventions of different quality. The current system does not reward breakthrough invention. A minor tweak to some kitchen gadget is granted the same patent as a major development.

Greater inventions need more time to be recouped. For example, new drugs should be given a longer patent life span to allow companies to recoup expenses. In most countries, they use a multi-tier system, and a junior form of patent expires sooner.

via Q&A: Small inventors raise patent overhaul concerns – Post Tech – The Washington Post.

In essence, Poltorak identifies the fact that an improved can opener receives essentially the same patent protection as a cure for cancer as one of the problems with the current patent system.  So far as I am aware, no one so far has suggested that the United States adopt a “utility model” system, such as the ones that are common in Asian countries.

Although similar, there are key differences between a typical utility model and a patent.  Utility models tend to carry a shorter term and are subject to less strenuous examination (if any).  On the differences between utility model and patent protection in China, attorney James Hayes notes:

[T]he value in having a utility model verses an invention patent in terms of enforcement lies in the ability to enforce the utility model patent sooner. Therefore, the utility model option is particularly attractive in technologies, such as electronics, which require a longer time to issue as an invention patent. Also, if a corporation’s inventions would be obsolete in 10 years, the utility model patent is a viable alternative.

Via Chinese Utility Model Patents Might Cut Your IP Costs by Half While Providing Better Protection

But in the United States, all inventions are treated equal, mostly because that’s the way we’ve always done it.

Alexander Poltorak is listed as an inventor on numerous US patents and applications in various fields ranging from gene compositions to e-commerce.



One thought on “Cross-Post: General Patent Corporation Owner Poltorak Suggests Improvements To Patent System

  1. ……..Stephen Yang Peksung Intellectual Property Beijing China.China s patent system provides three types of patent rights invention utility model and design. Another reason is that the utility model system seems to have been undervalued or even discredited..However questions surrounding the value of utility model patents and how to strategically use China s utility model system are still of great interest to many foreign applicants.

    Posted by business | April 7, 2011, 5:26 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 305 other followers

Subscribe to GametimeIP via Feedburner

%d bloggers like this: