//
you're reading...
IP, Patent

Interval Licensing Defendants Fail To Identify Prior Art

Patents asserted against Google, AOL, Yahoo and several others were suggested to be “one of the most obvious things out there” according to certain pundits (evidently date stamped repositories of all technical knowledge).  On Wednesday we learned that, despite such protestations, proof of such obviousness was not as easily identified.  Having failed to identify satisfactory prior art on their own, the defendants are now hoping

Article One’s crowdsourcing model can save the day:

The nine companies being sued for patent infringement by Paul Allen’s Interval Licensing are hoping for a little help from their friends. Digits has learned that Article One Partners, a company specialized in using crowdsourcing to foil patent suits, has been asked to find “prior art” that would invalidate those patents.

Via Paul Allen’s Foes Hope for Help From the ‘Crowd’

Just goes to show that it’s very easy, in hindsight, to suggest that something is obvious … proving it, however, is another matter altogether.

Advertisements

Discussion

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: Frivolous Patent Lawsuit Illustrates High Cost Of Litigation « Gametime IP - March 18, 2011

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: