//
you're reading...
IP, Patent

Private Research And Patent Litigation

My new column, Patent Connections, has kicked off over at PatentCalls.com.  The first entry, From Bottomlines to Headlines: How Private Research Leads To Patent Litigation dicsusses the role of private research in patent licensing and litigation. As an example, my column discusses the current patent litigation by Interval Licensing, and links to this much more in depth report on the Interval Licensing patent portfolio.  Of course, this is only one example, as I note in the column:

Interval Licensing is not the only example of private research leading to patent litigation. Quite famously, patents issuing out of research at AT&T’s Bell Labs, including US Patent 5,341,457, resulted in one of the largest liability verdicts of all time, $1.5 Billion in favor of Alcatel-Lucent over Microsoft. More recently, Ralink sued competitor Lantiq over US Patent 5,394,116, which it acquired, along with four other patents, from Lucent spin-out Agere Systems (sometime after Agere’s merger with LSI). Like the ‘457 Patent, the ‘116 issued out of Bell Labs. While AT&T might not realize any direct financial gain from Ralink’s monetization efforts, the IP may have provided some benefit when leaving Lucent for the spin-out Agere. Today, AT&T also attempts to monetize its patents through auction at ICAP Ocean Tomo. (See the ICAP Fall Catalog, identifying six separate lots offered by AT&T Intellectual Property, Inc.).

About these ads

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 311 other followers

%d bloggers like this: